County Commissioners, from left, John Hillock, Todd Nash and Susan Roberts are shown during a meeting in early December 2021. Wallowa County took steps Thursday, Dec. 30, 2021, that will possibly result in getting a portion of Oregon’s $329 million share of the National Opioid Settlement Agreement.

ENTERPRISE — Wallowa County took steps Thursday, Dec. 30, that will possibly result in getting a portion of Oregon’s $329 million share of the National Opioid Settlement Agreement, as the county commissioners authorized signing onto the settlement.

During an emergency meeting to address the matter before the year ended, county counsel Paige Sully said the reason for the emergency was to not hinder going forward with the statewide and federal settlement.

“The reason that we needed to do this on less than standard notice is because all of the entities that are going to sign this agreement have to have it signed by the second (of January),” Sully told the commissioners.

The national settlement is to resolve all opioids litigation brought by states and local political subdivisions against the three largest pharmaceutical distributors: McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen, and manufacturer Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its parent company Johnson & Johnson. The settlements will provide substantial funds to states and their subdivisions for abatement of the opioids epidemic across the country and will impose transformative changes in the way the settling defendants conduct their business.

Sully emphasized that although Wallowa County is not a litigant in the settlement, the county could be a beneficiary of funds the state receives. Litigating entities — be they cities or counties — must have populations of at least 10,000. Wallowa County’s population is a bit more than 7,300.

“The agreement is such that 45% of the settlement funds shall be allocated to the state of Oregon and 55% of the settlement funds shall be allocated to the Oregon participating subdivisions. The state will deposit its funds in a prevention, treatment and recovery fund that will be used for abatement uses,” Sully told the commissioners. “We will not take a direct distribution. We will, however, have the opportunity to benefit from funds from the state. There’s also a provision that subdivisions can act in concert.”

For example, she said, the neighboring counties that will be direct recipients could band together with Wallowa County to set up some type of regional program.

“I haven’t seen the final paperwork, but frankly, it doesn’t make any difference because we’re not litigating,” she said. “This will cost us nothing; we’re not going to be paying any of the attorneys’ fees.”

She said another reason for the rush to approve it is to not hamper the statewide efforts to reach the settlement.

“It will work a hardship on the litigating entities if we do not agree to sign the settlement agreement,” she said. “It’s my recommendation that you authorize me to do so when it comes through so that they can complete this settlement and move forward on collecting those funds.”

The commissioners voted to approve such authorization. But they had a couple of questions.

Commissioner John Hillock wondered about how any money the county should receive under the settlement could be used, such as for mental health or parole and probation.

“It will depend on what their grant application looks like,” Sully said. “But only if it’s related to abatement services or related to treatment.”

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.