Oregon Capitol.jpg

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown extended her COVID-19 emergency order through March. Oregon’s laws allow such use of emergency orders without legislative oversight.

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown on Dec. 17 extended her COVID-19 emergency order through March. She joins other governors in the region, Democrats and Republicans, in extending one-person rule.

We ask the indulgence of frequent readers as we plow ground we have worked a few times during the ongoing pandemic. As long as the governor reissues these orders without the review and explicit consent of the representatives of the people, we feel compelled to continue to take issue.

Did legislators who passed statutes granting governors the authority to declare emergencies envision a governor would use them indefinitely to shut down large segments of the economy for undetermined lengths of time, to close private and public schools and colleges, to forbid religious services and private gatherings, declare some businesses “essential” and others not, to rewrite the terms of rental contracts, and restrict access to common health care procedures and the courts?

We do not deny state governments must take steps to control the spread of the virus and protect residents. The experience of the last nine months demonstrates emergency orders should come with a statutory expiration date and a mandate for the Legislature to review actions under them.

Here the laws of Oregon fail the people of Oregon.

Two separate Oregon statutes give the governor the authority to declare emergencies and exercise broad powers. One specifically addresses public health emergencies, and the other is for general emergency situations. Brown has invoked both as authority for her executive orders.

The first statute imposes a 14-day limit on the declaration of a health emergency; the other imposes no limit.

Although statute allows the Legislature to terminate an emergency declaration on its own authority, it does not require lawmakers meet to consider any of the actions taken.

The Oregon Legislature has chosen to remain silent, so the fault lies with it. It has not been alone. Few state legislatures have cast votes to either affirm or challenge emergency declarations and the diktats issued in their name.

We need to change state laws to mandate legislative consent.

The dangers of the pandemic are real. Thousands have died, and many thousands more have been infected. The dangers of the shutdowns and restrictions under the emergency orders are real, too. Hundreds of thousands have been thrown out of work, tens of thousands lost businesses in which they invested their lives and fortunes, millions of school children are falling behind.

No elected official should be allowed to rule indefinitely by decree. We need laws to limit the duration of emergency powers and subject them to mandatory legislative oversight. A benevolent dictatorship in all but name is nonetheless tyranny.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.